Open Stack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> What if 3rd Party CI didn't vote in Gerrit? What if it instead
> published to some 3rd party test reporting site (a thing that
> doesn't yet exist). Gerrit has the facility so that we could inject
> the dashboard content for this in Gerrit in a little table
> somewhere, but the data would fundamentally live outside of Gerrit.
> It would also mean that all the aggregate reporting of 3rd Party CI
> that's being done in custom gerrit scripts, could be integrated
> directly into such a thing.

If it really does show up right in Gerrit as if it were integrated,
then that would be fine with me. I think the biggest problem we have
right now is that a lot of the CI systems are very inconsistent in
their reporting and we often don't realize when one of them *hasn't*
voted. If the new thing could fill out the chart based on everything
we expect to see a vote from, so that it's very clear that one is
missing, then that's a net win right there.

But at the end of the day, we need to make sure we're improving
visibility and not hiding all the noise they generate just because
it's annoying. As long as something like what was suggested here is
injected right into the gerrit API, then I'm in favor of something
like this.

- --Dan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTrar8AAoJEBeZxaMESjNVizsH/RfjoJOlX80N+jviDHG4yMUv
n9dRV2vFfitKmapN8HIWdo6aFjRDHb5t3BWcO+9xP7+w/nZYpC88Y6Eq8c8HeZPz
WIeVVY8/AmL/VVGXNojeIoCdszR8vdlaEaOrlKCjQIr8zqZJrz6LgPXIfoVCVrMg
hHN2+TM4rn9scFHlKSnf8vq7rLj/aTfzG+ITSSksslM2YxWkqDFWWBTrTnqrWHx5
Uk91JSFmWTC2UnbyVzPI88D0a7HGkpyxgFnWb8Y63RBr/JygFisoBLaqbHA9o9ML
ajI+st8ySBEwWGyVkckzX5Go1KWgTP9pH1zwhpZz+qvEZCJA6Pbp16+r+kTFBew=
=NkTB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----