? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Hearn <mrhearn at gmail.com> Date: Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:21 AM Subject: [Openstack] Glance - and the use of the "project_id:%(project_id)" rule To: "openstack at lists.openstack.org" <openstack at lists.openstack.org> Having played with the policies and rules within glance's policy.json file I have not had any success using the rule, "project_id:%(project_id)" to restrict api usage. Without changing user/role/tenant I have had success using project_id:%(project_id)" with cinder. I cannot find anything to suggest glance's policy engine cannot parse the rule but would like confirmation. Can anyone verify this?. This is using icehouse, glance 0.12.0 ~Mike _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140625/3c7d9a75/attachment.html>