On Jun 24, 2014 2:47 PM, "Rick Jones" <rick.jones2 at hp.com> wrote: > > On 06/24/2014 02:38 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: >> >> I agree nova shouldn't take any actions. But I don't think leaving an >> instance as 'active' is right either. I was thinking move instance to >> error state (maybe an unknown state would be more accurate) and let the >> user deal with it, versus just letting the user deal with everything. >> Since nova knows something *may* be wrong shouldn't we convey that to >> the user (I'm not 100% sure we should myself). > > > I suspect the user's first action will be to call Support asking "Hey, why is my perfectly usable instance showing-up in the ERROR|UNKNOWN state?" True, but the alternative is, why is this dead instance listed as ACTIVE, and I am being billed for it too. I think this is a loose-loose > > rick jones > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140624/93215f77/attachment.html>