Open Stack

Hi Mohammad,
Thank you for sharing the links.
Can you please elaborate on columns of the table in [1]. Is [R] supposed to be for spec review and [C] for code review?
If this correct, would it be possible to add [C] columns for already merged specs that still have the code under review?

Thanks a lot,
Irena

From: Mohammad Banikazemi [mailto:mb at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 8:02 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ml2] Tracking the reviews for ML2 related specs


In order to make the review process a bit easier (without duplicating too much data and without creating too much overhead), we have created a wiki to keep track of the ML2 related specs for the Juno cycle [1]. The idea is to organize the people who participate in the ML2 subgroup activities and get the related specs reviewed as much as possible in the subgroup before asking the broader community to review. (There is of course nothing that prevents others from reviewing these specs as soon as they are available for review.) If you have any ML2 related spec under review or being planned, you may want to update the wiki [1] accordingly.

We will see if this will be useful or not. If you have any comments or suggestions please post here or bring them to the IRC weekly meetings [2].

Best,

Mohammad

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tracking_ML2_Subgroup_Reviews
[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140615/76d7a189/attachment.html>