Open Stack

? 2014?06?11? 05:09, Jiang, Yunhong ??:
>
> Hi, Robert
>
>          For your first question, I suspect it's something wrong and 
> should be 'devi_id', which is the hypervisor's identification for the 
> device. I will leave Yongli to have more comments on it.
>
sorry for later, this name is libvirt returned device name, use to 
oprate the device via libvirt later. device_id might a good name for this.

Yongli He
>
>          For the second one, thanks for point the issue out. Yes, I'm 
> working on fixing it.
>
> --jyh
>
> *From:*Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:baoli at cisco.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:46 PM
> *To:* Jiang, Yunhong; He, Yongli
> *Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev][nova][pci] A couple of questions
>
> Hi Yunhong & Yongli,
>
> In the routine _prepare_pci_devices_for_use(), it's referring to 
> dev['hypervisor_name']. I didn't see code that's setting it up, or the 
> libvirt nodedev xml includes hypervisor_name. Is this specific to Xen?
>
> Another question is about the issue that was raised in this review: 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82206/. It's about the use of node id 
> or host name in the PCI device table. I'd like to know you guys' 
> thoughts on that.
>
> thanks,
>
> Robert
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140613/1e608f01/attachment.html>