[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Barbican Neutron LBaaS Integration Ideas

Clint Byrum clint at fewbar.com
Mon Jun 9 23:42:28 UTC 2014

Excerpts from Douglas Mendizabal's message of 2014-06-09 16:08:02 -0700:
> Hi all,
> I’m strongly in favor of having immutable TLS-typed containers, and very
> much opposed to storing every revision of changes done to a container.  I
> think that storing versioned containers would add too much complexity to
> Barbican, where immutable containers would work well.

Agree completely. Create a new one for new values. Keep the old ones
while they're still active.

> I’m still not sold on the idea of registering services with Barbican, even
> though (or maybe especially because) Barbican would not be using this data
> for anything.  I understand the problem that we’re trying to solve by
> associating different resources across projects, but I don’t feel like
> Barbican is the right place to do this.

Agreed also, this is simply not Barbican or Neutron's role. Be a REST
API for secrets and networking, not all dancing all singing nannies that
prevent any possibly dangerous behavior with said API's.

> It seems we’re leaning towards option #2, but I would argue that
> orchestration of services is outside the scope of Barbican’s role as a
> secret-store.  I think this is a problem that may need to be solved at a
> higher level.  Maybe an openstack-wide registry of dependend entities
> across services?

An optional openstack-wide registry of depended entities is called

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list