Open Stack

> Hi folks
> 
> ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4.
> Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding
> neutron network & route target.

can you explain a little more?

do you have api suggestions?

YAMAMOTO Takashi

> so I think contrail is a only solution for  BGPVPN implementation now.
> 
> 
> 
> 2014-05-30 2:22 GMT-07:00 Mathieu Rohon <mathieu.rohon at gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was about mentionning ExaBGP too! can we also consider using those
>> BGP speakers for BGPVPN implementation [1].
>> This would be consistent to have the same BGP speaker used for every
>> BGP needs inside Neutron.
>>
>> [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jaume Devesa <devvesa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Takashi,
>>>
>>> thanks for doing this! As we have proposed ExaBgp[1] in the Dynamic Routing
>>> blueprint[2], I've added a new column for this speaker in the wiki page. I
>>> plan to fill it soon.
>>>
>>> ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in library
>>> mode would be much more easy to deal with (especially the exceptions and
>>> corner cases) and the code would be much cleaner. But seems that Ryu BGP
>>> also can fit in this requirement. And having the help from a Ryu developer
>>> like you turns it into a promising candidate!
>>>
>>> I'll start working now in a proof of concept to run the agent with these
>>> implementations and see if we need more requirements to compare between the
>>> speakers.
>>>
>>> [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/BGPSpeakersComparison
>>> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 May 2014 18:42, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto at valinux.co.jp> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> as per discussions on l3 subteem meeting today, i started
>>>> a bgp speakers comparison wiki page for this bp.
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/BGPSpeakersComparison
>>>>
>>>> Artem, can you add other requirements as columns?
>>>>
>>>> as one of ryu developers, i'm naturally biased to ryu bgp.
>>>> i appreciate if someone provides more info for other bgp speakers.
>>>>
>>>> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>>>>
>>>> > Good afternoon Neutron developers!
>>>> >
>>>> > There has been a discussion about dynamic routing in Neutron for the
>>>> > past few weeks in the L3 subteam weekly meetings. I've submitted a review
>>>> > request of the blueprint documenting the proposal of this feature:
>>>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/. If you have any feedback or
>>>> > suggestions for improvement, I would love to hear your comments and include
>>>> > your thoughts in the document.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you.
>>>> >
>>>> > Sincerely,
>>>> > Artem Dmytrenko
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jaume Devesa
>>> Software Engineer at Midokura
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev