[openstack-dev] [nova] stable branches & failure to handle review backlog

Russell Bryant rbryant at redhat.com
Tue Jul 29 19:01:44 UTC 2014


On 07/29/2014 12:12 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Sure there was some debate about what criteria were desired acceptance
> when stable trees were started. Once the criteria are defined I don't
> think it is credible to say that people are incapable of following the
> rules. In the unlikely event that people were to willfully ignore the
> agreed upon rules for stable tree, then I'd not trust them to be part
> of a core team working on any branch at all. With responsibility comes
> trust and an acceptance to follow the agreed upon processes.

I agree with this.  If we can't trust someone on *-core to follow the
stable criteria, then they shouldn't be on *-core in the first place.
Further, if we can't trust the combination of *two* people from *-core
to approve a stable backport, then we're really in trouble.

-- 
Russell Bryant



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list