[openstack-dev] [nova] bug discussion at mid cycle meet up
Russell Bryant
rbryant at redhat.com
Tue Jul 29 18:48:12 UTC 2014
On 07/29/2014 11:43 AM, Tracy Jones wrote:
> 3. We have bugs that are really not bugs but features, or performance
> issues. They really should be a BP not a bug, but we don’t want these
> things to fall off the radar so they are bugs… But we don’t really know
> what to do with them. Should they be closed? Should they have a
> different category – like feature request?? Perhaps they should just be
> wish list??
I don't think blueprint are appropriate for tracking requests. They
should only be created when someone is proposing actually doing the work.
I think Wishlist is fine for keeping a list of requests. That's what
I've been using it for.
> In generate we need to tighten up the definition of triaged and
> confirmed. Bugs should move from New -> Confirmed -> Triaged -> In
> Progress. JayPipes has updated the wiki to clarify this.
>
> * Confirmed means someone has looked at the bug, saw there was enough
> into to start to diagnose, and agreed it sounds like a bug.
> * Triaged means someone has analyzed the bug and can propose a
> solution (not necessarily a patch). If the person is not going to
> fix it, they should update the bug with the proposal and move the
> bug into Triaged.
We should be careful not to conflict with the guidelines set for all
OpenStack projects here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage
For example, that page says when a bug should be set to Confirmed or
Triaged. In most cases, it's Confirmed. Triage is when there is a
known solution.
--
Russell Bryant
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list