[openstack-dev] [heat] health maintenance in autoscaling groups
Mike Spreitzer
mspreitz at us.ibm.com
Fri Jul 25 04:01:52 UTC 2014
Doug Wiegley <dougw at a10networks.com> wrote on 07/23/2014 11:24:32 PM:
> Hi Mike,
>
> > and listed the possible values of the status field, including
> "INACTIVE". Other sources are telling me that status=INACTIVE when
> the health monitor thinks the member is unhealthy, status!=INACTIVE
> when the health monitor thinks the member is healthy. What's going on
here?
>
> Indeed, the code will return a server status of INACTIVE if the
> lbaas agent marks a member ‘DOWN’. But, nowhere can I find that it
> actually ever does so.
>
> My statements about the status field for lbaas/neutron came from the
> author of the ref lbaas driver; I’ll check with him tomorrow and see
> if I misunderstood.
I did an experiment, and found that the PoolMember status did indeed
switch between ACTIVE and INACTIVE depending on the health of the member.
Thanks,
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140725/e3bb2abd/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list