[openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled shutdown of GuestOS
Michael Still
mikal at stillhq.com
Fri Jul 25 00:02:04 UTC 2014
Yep, I think this one has well and truly crossed the line. Exception granted.
Michael
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Andrew Laski
<andrew.laski at rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Day, Phil [philip.day at hp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:20 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. Berrange
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled shutdown of GuestOS
>
> According to: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-juno-spec-priorities alaski has also singed up for this if I drop the point of contention - which I'ev done
>
>
> Yes, I will sponsor this one as well. This is more a bug fix than a feature IMO and would be really nice to get into Juno.
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Still [mailto:mikal at stillhq.com]
>> Sent: 24 July 2014 00:50
>> To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled
>> shutdown of GuestOS
>>
>> Another core sponsor would be nice on this one. Any takers?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 06:08:52PM +0000, Day, Phil wrote:
>> >> Hi Folks,
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to propose the following as an exception to the spec freeze, on the
>> basis that it addresses a potential data corruption issues in the Guest.
>> >>
>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89650
>> >>
>> >> We were pretty close to getting acceptance on this before, apart from a
>> debate over whether one additional config value could be allowed to be set
>> via image metadata - so I've given in for now on wanting that feature from a
>> deployer perspective, and said that we'll hard code it as requested.
>> >>
>> >> Initial parts of the implementation are here:
>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68942/
>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99916/
>> >
>> > Per my comments already, I think this is important for Juno and will
>> > sponsor it.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Daniel
>> > --
>> > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/
>> :|
>> > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
>> > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
>> > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rackspace Australia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Rackspace Australia
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list