[openstack-dev] [oslo] graduating oslo.middleware

Davanum Srinivas davanum at gmail.com
Wed Jul 23 20:49:10 UTC 2014


I agree with Ben. (" I don't want to set a precedent where we make a
bunch of changes on Github and then import that code ")

-- dims

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> wrote:
> On 2014-07-23 13:25, gordon chung wrote:
>
>> I left a comment on one of the commits, but in general here are my
>> thoughts:
>> 1) I would prefer not to do things like switch to oslo.i18n outside of
>> Gerrit.  I realize we don't have a specific existing policy for this, but
>> doing that significant
>> work outside of Gerrit is not desirable IMHO.  It needs to happen either
>> before graduation or after import into Gerrit.
>> 2) I definitely don't want to be accepting "enable [hacking check]"
>> changes outside Gerrit.  The github graduation step is _just_ to get the
>> code in shape so it
>> can be imported with the tests passing.  It's perfectly acceptable to me
>> to just ignore any hacking checks during this step and fix them in Gerrit
>> where, again,
>> the changes can be reviewed.
>> At a glance I don't see any problems with the changes that have been made,
>> but I haven't looked that closely and I think it brings up some topics for
>> clarification in the graduation process.
>
>
> i'm ok to revert if there are concerns. i just vaguely remember a reference
> in another oslo lib about waiting for i18n graduation but tbh i didn't
> actually check back to see what conclusion was.
>
>
> cheers,
> gord
>
> I have no specific concerns, but I don't want to set a precedent where we
> make a bunch of changes on Github and then import that code.  The work on
> Github should be limited to the minimum necessary to get the unit tests
> passing (basically if it's not listed in
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary#Manual_Fixes then
> it should happen in Gerrit).  Once that happens the project can be imported
> and any further changes made under our standard review process.  Either that
> or changes can be made in incubator before graduation and reviewed then.
>
> So I guess I'm a soft -1 on this for right now, but I'll defer to the other
> Oslo cores because I don't really have time to take a more detailed look at
> the repo and I don't want to be a blocker when I may not be around to
> discuss it.
>
> -Ben
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list