[openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging] Further improvements and refactoring
Doug Hellmann
doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com
Wed Jul 2 15:17:30 UTC 2014
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 01/07/14 17:14, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please see some minor comments inline. Do you think we can schedule
>> some time to discuss this topic on one of the upcoming meetings? We
>> can come out with some kind of the summary and actions plan to
>> start working on.
>
> Please check: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo I think
> you can add your case in the agenda. That's how it works in e.g. Neutron.
I've been trying to keep the Oslo meetings focused on status updates
and issue reports from or liaisons. Let's work on reaching consensus
on this change here on the mailing list where we have the time and
space for a long-form conversation.
Doug
>
>>>>>>>> There are a lot of questions that should be answered
>>>>>>>> to implement this: Where such tests would run (jenking,
>>>>>>>> local PC, devstack VM)?
>>>>> I would expect it to be exposed to jenkins thru 'tox'. We
>>>>> then can set up a separate job to run them and compare with a
>>>>> base line [TBD: what *is* baseline?] to make sure we don't
>>>>> introduce performance regressions.
>>>>>> Such tests cannot be exposed thru 'tox' since they require
>>>>>> some environment setup (rabbitmq-server, zeromq matchmaker,
>>>>>> etc.). Such setup is way out of scope for tox. Cause of
>>>>>> this we should find some other way to run such tests.
>> You may just assume server is already set and available thru a
>> common socket.
>>> Assuming that something is already setup is not an option. If we
>>> add new env to tox I assume that anyone can run it locally and
>>> get the same results as he would get from jenkins.
>
> Fair enough. You can look into tempest then. I don't know whether they
> already have some framework for performance testing though.
>
> /Ihar
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTs9UIAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57USMH/j4dfCdAl2QKCMLDWzopLqon
> 41gqq8DsKDhc/I24z2KNYqRPk43tQvR9dWhbnbs1XlqXk0keozQ2YNE8pvuZyqok
> VN4/l435ewHJ3OyZePQLANgDBrAVdWRmmLWJwGJZ8ceTfZRV1MN+vsLHGwCMFinU
> J/8UAR8XUF5UVrd/VONsvVSwDnx1v7vs8zM9aICfos0F4ByMU9bPThdeUiuJOTuU
> xNP+FEdlNwwlc4sAwm3qHKJIVe7gYSojIfQGhmBlXWpPKA1SYoT5I6qMZibsbtlM
> VE092du9APc8LLnE3DdMS6CuUuABbljUtAxUr5z8CirIDoh9n/c5+e8Jfbb8zHU=
> =OwOm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list