Open Stack

I'd be happy to remove it for now. As I said, this is a staging location to
allow us to test that our docs generation process is working, it is not
documented anywhere and no one is using it. I just wanted to show that the
team is working on moving things over.

Jarret

From:  Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org>
Reply-To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date:  Wednesday, January 29, 2014 at 4:54 PM
To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Cc:  "barbican at lists.rackspace.com" <barbican at lists.rackspace.com>
Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican Incubation Review




On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Jarret Raim <jarret.raim at rackspace.com>
wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Barbican, the key management service for OpenStack, requested incubation
> before the holidays. After the initial review, there were several issues
> brought up by various individuals that needed to be resolved
> pre-incubation. At this point, we have completed the work on those tasks.
> I'd like to request a final review before a vote on our incubation at the
> next TC meeting, which should be on 2/4.
> 
> The list of tasks and their status is documented as part of our incubation
> request, which is on the openstack wiki:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/Incubation
> 
> 
> The only outstanding PR on the list is our devstack integration. I'd love
> it if we could get some eyes on that patch. Things seem to be working for
> us in our testing, but it'd be great to get some feedback from -infra to
> make sure we aren¹t going to cause any headaches for the gate. The review
> is here:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69962
> 
> 
> During our initial request, there was a conversation about our being a
> mostly Rackspace driven effort. While it was decided that diversifying the
> team isn't a requirement for incubation, it is for integration and we've
> made some headway on that effort. At this point, we have external
> contributors from eVault, HP and RedHat that have submitted code and / or
> blueprints for the system. There are other folks that have expressed
> interest in contributing, so I'm hopeful that our team will continue to
> diversify over the course of our incubation period.
> 
> Our general page is here:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican
> 
> Our GitHub documentation:
> https://github.com/cloudkeep/barbican
> https://github.com/cloudkeep/barbican/wiki
> 
> We are currently working on moving this documentation to the OpenStack
> standard docbook format. We have a ways to go on this front, but the
> staging area for that work can be found here:
> http://docs.cloudkeep.io/barbican-devguide/content/preface.html
> 
> 
Hi Jarret -
Please don't use the OpenStack branding on your output prior to permission
through this process.
Thanks,
Anne
 
> The team hangs out in the #openstack-barbican channel on freenode. If you
> want to talk, stop on by.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jarret Raim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140129/1ec0cf5c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140129/1ec0cf5c/attachment.bin>