Open Stack

For those of you in Europe, I would appreciate your attendance at 2100 UTC if you can make it. I know this is a bad time for you, so I will also jump in #openstack-meeting-alt on Friday at 1600 UTC. We can have an impromptu discussion there so I can incorporate your knowledge and feedback into the 2100 meeting.

Thanks!

Vish

On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:59 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvananda at gmail.com> wrote:

> I apologize for the confusion. The Wiki time of 2100 UTC is the correct time (Noon Pacific time). We can move tne next meeting to a different day/time that is more convienient for Europe.
> 
> Vish
> 
> 
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Florent Flament <florent.flament-ext at cloudwatt.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Vishvananda,
>> 
>> I would be interested in such a working group.
>> Can you please confirm the meeting hour for this Friday ?
>> I've seen 1600 UTC in your email and 2100 UTC in the wiki ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Hierarchical_Multitenancy_Meeting ). As I'm in Europe I'd prefer 1600 UTC.
>> 
>> Florent Flament
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Vishvananda Ishaya" <vishvananda at gmail.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:35:15 PM
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] Hierarchicical Multitenancy Discussion
>> 
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> I apologize for the obtuse title, but there isn't a better succinct term to describe what is needed. OpenStack has no support for multiple owners of objects. This means that a variety of private cloud use cases are simply not supported. Specifically, objects in the system can only be managed on the tenant level or globally.
>> 
>> The key use case here is to delegate administration rights for a group of tenants to a specific user/role. There is something in Keystone called a “domain” which supports part of this functionality, but without support from all of the projects, this concept is pretty useless.
>> 
>> In IRC today I had a brief discussion about how we could address this. I have put some details and a straw man up here:
>> 
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy
>> 
>> I would like to discuss this strawman and organize a group of people to get actual work done by having an irc meeting this Friday at 1600UTC. I know this time is probably a bit tough for Europe, so if we decide we need a regular meeting to discuss progress then we can vote on a better time for this meeting.
>> 
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Hierarchical_Multitenancy_Meeting
>> 
>> Please note that this is going to be an active team that produces code. We will *NOT* spend a lot of time debating approaches, and instead focus on making something that works and learning as we go. The output of this team will be a MultiTenant devstack install that actually works, so that we can ensure the features we are adding to each project work together.
>> 
>> Vish
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140129/2fe30171/attachment.pgp>