Open Stack

On 27/01/14 14:49 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote:
>Zhi Yan, FWIW, your concern is reasonable. Thanks for raising it. Based on the
>Glance v1 strategy, and backward-compatibility concern, maybe we should mark it
>as won't fix?
>
>Brian, may I get your opinion on this from a product manager perspective?
>Thanks.


This is a backward incompatible change and IMHO, there's no easy way
forward.

That said, I think the normalization of image properties is a good
thing to have so, I'd prefer not changing this bits. I'd rather make
it clear in the documentation.

Cheers,
FF

>
>Thanks & Best regards,
>Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Tech Lead of Nitrogen (SME team)
>Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
>Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
>Email: flwang at cn.ibm.com
>China Systems & Technology Laboratory in Beijing
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>Inactive hide details for Zhi Yan Liu ---01/27/2014 02:00:49 PM--- at flwang, np
>at all. We can put the input in bug report as a cZhi Yan Liu ---01/27/2014
>02:00:49 PM--- at flwang, np at all. We can put the input in bug report as a
>comment or here anyway,
>
>From: Zhi Yan Liu <lzy.dev at gmail.com>
>To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
><openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
>Date: 01/27/2014 02:00 PM
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
>x-image-meta-property parameter.
>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>
>
>
>@flwang, np at all. We can put the input in bug report as a comment
>or here anyway, as far as it can let us/me know the gains/advantages on this
>"fix".
>
>I'd like to know whether there is a backward-compatibility issue, but seems
>it's not a big deal? To keep the image property be case-sensitive is make
>sense, at last it is better if we keep same property name as client provided.
>
>zhiyan
>
>On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Fei Long Wang <flwang at cn.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>    Zhi Yan,
>
>    I think you're talking about backward-compatibility, right? I would say
>    it's possible, just like the v2 is not compatible with v1 against this. So
>    that's why I would like to see a bug is opened to track this and then we
>    get also some comments from the end user/product manager perspective to
>    decide to mark it as won't fix or go ahead.
>
>
>    Thanks & Best regards,
>    Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Tech Lead of Nitrogen (SME team)
>    Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
>    Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
>    Email: flwang at cn.ibm.com
>    China Systems & Technology Laboratory in Beijing
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>    Inactive hide details for Zhi Yan Liu ---01/27/2014 01:02:40 AM---One quick
>    question, do you think there is a potential backwarZhi Yan Liu ---01/27/
>    2014 01:02:40 AM---One quick question, do you think there is a potential
>    backward-capability breaking issue for end use
>
>    From: Zhi Yan Liu <lzy.dev at gmail.com>
>    To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>    openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
>    Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>    openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>    Date: 01/27/2014 01:02 AM
>
>    Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
>    x-image-meta-property parameter.
>    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>   
>
>
>    One quick question, do you think there is a potential backward-capability
>    breaking issue for end user or ISV if we remove existing standardizing/
>    normalizing logic? I'd like to know the gains/advantages on this "fix".
>
>    thanks,
>    zhiyan
>
>    Sent from my iPad
>
>    On 2014年1月26日, at 23:49, Fei Long Wang <flwang at cn.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>        Hey Jay, thanks for calling my name correctly :)
>
>        Wang Hong, feel free to open a bug to track this. And we can get more
>        info/comments when the patch is reviewed. Thanks.
>
>
>        Thanks & Best regards,
>        Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
>        ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>        Tech Lead of Nitrogen (SME team)
>        Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
>        Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
>        Email: flwang at cn.ibm.com
>        China Systems & Technology Laboratory in Beijing
>        ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>        <graycol.gif>Jay Pipes ---01/26/2014 11:20:40 PM---On Sun, 2014-01-26
>        at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Wang Hong,
>
>        From: Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com>
>        To: Fei Long Wang/China/IBM at IBMCN,
>        Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>        openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>        Date: 01/26/2014 11:20 PM
>        Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
>        x-image-meta-property parameter. 
>
>        ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>       
>
>
>        On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote:
>        > Hi Wang Hong,
>        >
>        > Good catch. I think the issue is caused by line 244-246, see
>        > https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/
>        utils.py#L244 For the case-matter issue, I think it's a bug. But as for
>        the - to _, I would like to listen Jay's opinion since who is the
>        original author. And obviously, it's intentional change.
>
>        Hi Wang Hong adnd Fei Long,
>
>        It's been a long time since I wrote that :) To be honest, I'm not sure
>        why -- other than just standardizing/normalizing the input, we did
>        that.
>        Perhaps it had something to do with vendor-specific properties that had
>        a prefix that used hyphens, but I'm really not sure... perhaps I am
>        getting too old :)
>
>        Best,
>        -jay
>
>        > Inactive hide details for 王宏 ---01/26/2014 05:14:02 PM---Hi all. If
>        > I use the following command to create an image:王宏 ---01/26/2014
>        > 05:14:02 PM---Hi all. If I use the following command to create an
>        > image:
>        >
>        > From: 王宏 <w.wanghong1 at gmail.com>
>        > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org,
>        > Date: 01/26/2014 05:14 PM
>        > Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
>        > x-image-meta-property parameter.
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        ______________________________________________________________________
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > Hi all.
>        >
>        > If I use the following command to create an image:
>        > curl -i -H "X-Auth-Token:268c536db05b435bb6e631158744e3f6" -H
>        > "x-image-meta-property-IMAGE-TYPE:xxx" -H "x-image-meta-name:test" -X
>        > POST http://127.0.0.1:9292/v1/images
>        >
>        > I will get the following results:
>        > {"image": {"status": "queued", "deleted": false, "container_format":
>        > null, "min_ram": 0, "updated_at": "2014-01-26T08:51:54", "owner":
>        > "9a38c1cda5344dd288331b988739c834", "min_disk": 0, "is_public":
>        false,
>        > "deleted_at": null, "id": "696ab97d-0e6f-46f1-8570-b6db707a748b",
>        > "size": 0, "name": "test", "checksum": null, "created_at":
>        > "2014-01-26T08:51:54", "disk_format": null, "properties":
>        > {"image_type": "xxx"}, "protected": false}}
>        >
>        > The capital letters in the property will be converted to lowercase
>        > letters and "-" will be converted to "_"("IMAGE-TYPE"=>"image_type").
>        >
>        > Is it a bug? Thanks.
>        >
>        > Best regards.
>        > wanghong_______________________________________________
>        > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>        > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>        > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>        >
>
>
>
>        _______________________________________________
>        OpenStack-dev mailing list
>        OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>        http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>        _______________________________________________
>        OpenStack-dev mailing list
>        OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>        http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    OpenStack-dev mailing list
>    OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140127/72fdf79e/attachment.pgp>