Open Stack

Hi all,

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 01:13:53PM +0000, Derek Higgins wrote:
> It looks like we have some duplication and inconsistencies on the 3
> os-*-config elements in the tripleo repositories
> 
> os-apply-config (duplication) :
>    We have two elements that install this
>      diskimage-builder/elements/config-applier/
>      tripleo-image-elements/elements/os-apply-config/
> 
>    As far as I can tell the version in diskimage-builder isn't used by
> tripleo and the upstart file is broke
> ./dmesg:[   13.336184] init: Failed to spawn config-applier main
> process: unable to execute: No such file or directory
> 
>    To avoid confusion I propose we remove
> diskimage-builder/elements/config-applier/ (or deprecated if we have a
> suitable process) but would like to call it out here first to see if
> anybody is using it or thinks its a bad idea?


Too late, it's already removed :)
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/?id=63a4c1e9d52d57e0f82a6fa2f89f745592f1a2de

 
> inconsistencies
>   os-collect-config, os-refresh-config : these are both installed from
> git into the global site-packages
>   os-apply-config : installed from a released tarball into its own venv
> 
>   To be consistent with the other elements all 3 I think should be
> installed from git into its own venv, thoughts?
> 
> If no objections I'll go ahead an do this next week,
> 

I will add another one:
Some elements are already using the old os-config-applier dir to store the configuration templates.
It works, but I think is time to move them to os-apply-config to avoid confusion.

Ghe Rivero