[openstack-dev] [oslo][db] Mysql traditional session mode
Jay Pipes
jaypipes at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 17:50:53 UTC 2014
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 11:29 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
> A while back a change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47820/) was made
> to allow enabling mysql traditional mode, which tightens up mysql's
> input checking to disallow things like silent truncation of strings that
> exceed the column's allowed length and invalid dates (as I understand
> it).
>
> IMHO, some compelling arguments were made that we should always be using
> traditional mode and as such we started logging a warning if it was not
> enabled. It has recently come to my attention
> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68474/) that not everyone agrees, so I
> wanted to bring it to the list to get as wide an audience for the
> discussion as possible and hopefully come to a consensus so we don't end
> up having this discussion every few months.
>
> I remain of the opinion that traditional mode is a good thing and we
> _should_ be enabling it. I would call silent truncation and bogus date
> values bugs that should be fixed, but maybe there are other implications
> of this mode that I'm not aware of.
Why traditional? Why not STRICT_ALL_TABLES?
> It was also pointed out that the warning is logged even if the user
> forces traditional mode through my.cnf. While this certainly solves the
> underlying problem, it doesn't change the fact that the application was
> trying to do something bad. We tried to make it clear in the log
> message that this is a developer problem and the user needs to pester
> the developer to enable the mode, but maybe there's more discussion that
> needs to go on there as well.
What I was trying to point out with that is that if I see a warning in a
log file about not enabling traditional mode, and yet I've set my my.cnf
server sql_mode to STRICT_TRANS_TABLES, TRADITIONAL, or
STRICT_ALL_TABLES, then I shouldn't see a warning in the code...
It's easy enough to check... SHOW [GLOBAL] VARIABLES LIKE 'sql_mode'...
Best,
-jay
> Any thoughts on this would be welcomed. Thanks.
>
> -Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list