On Thu, Jan 23 2014, Matthieu Huin wrote: > This doesn't seem like something that will be done: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/020799.html > My understanding is that the favored approach would be to let each component > manage quotas on their own, with an eventual unification at the client > level. Too bad. I would definitely like not having Ceilometer handling quotas itself. At least for now I would restrict the quota handling part to a very simple per-user and/or per-project for that I think. I've marked the blueprint as approved as I don't think there's much debate to have around it. If you plan to deliver this for Icehouse, please set a milestone to it. -- Julien Danjou ;; Free Software hacker ; independent consultant ;; http://julien.danjou.info -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140123/eba30f04/attachment.pgp>