[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes
Tzu-Mainn Chen
tzumainn at redhat.com
Wed Jan 22 16:44:08 UTC 2014
Thanks for the update!
One question - is it possible to move the "Deploying Status" bar from page 12 to page 14?
The reason is that the former looks like a "Deployment Creation" page, while the latter is
a "Deployment Detail" page. For me, the former is about sending parameters to the API to
create an overcloud; the latter is for information about an already created overcloud. And
if we have a 'deployment status' then we already have an overcloud (a stack with a
CREATE_IN_PROGRESS status).
There are also other times when the detail page might need that status bar - when one user
scales the deployment upwards, say - so I think it makes sense to establish the status bar there.
If we do move the Deploying Status bar, then maybe we can also include the expected Resource
count in the details page? Right now, that page only shows the actual Resource count
(from Heat); adding the expected Resource count (from Tuskar) could provide verification that
expectations match reality.
Mainn
----- Original Message -----
> Hey everybody,
>
> I am sending updated wireframes.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-22_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf
>
> Updates:
> * p15-18 for down-scaling deployment
>
> Any questions are welcome, I am happy to answer them.
> -- Jarda
>
>
> On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and
> > tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe.
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf
> >
> >
> > Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if you
> > find something what is missing which is critical for the first release
> > (or that we are implementing a feature which should not have such high
> > priority), please speak up now.
> >
> > The wireframes are very close to implementation. In time, there will
> > appear more views and we will see if we can get them in as well.
> >
> > Thanks all for participation
> > -- Jarda
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list