Le 22/01/2014 15:57, Mike Spreitzer a écrit : > > Is that enough? Remember that some of us are concerned with business > workloads, rather than HPC jobs. While it might be acceptable in a > business workload to plan on regularly recycling every individual > instance, it is definitely not acceptable to plan on a specific end to > a given workload. And if the workload lives on, then usage of > particular hosts can live on (at least for a pretty large amount of > time like the product of (lifetime of a VM) * (number of VMs on the > host) ). > > Thanks, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev That's why we think we need to implement different options for lease ending (e.g. destroy the instances, evacuate the instances to other hosts or put the host away from Climate)... -Sylvain -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140122/a5692050/attachment.html>