[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles
Jaromir Coufal
jcoufal at redhat.com
Wed Jan 22 12:09:47 UTC 2014
On 2014/22/01 10:00, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>
>
> On 2014/22/01 00:56, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
>> Hiya - Resource is actually a Heat term that corresponds to what we're
>> deploying within
>> the Overcloud Stack - i.e., if we specify that we want an Overcloud
>> with 1 Controller
>> and 3 Compute, Heat will create a Stack that contains 1 Controller and
>> 3 Compute
>> Resources.
>
> Then a quick question - why do we design deployment by
> increasing/decreasing number of *instances* instead of resources?
>
> -- Jarda
And one more thing - Resource is very broad term as well as Role is. The
only difference is that Heat accepted 'Resource' as specific term for
them (you see? they used broad term for their concept). So I am asking
myself, where is difference between generic term Resource and Role? Why
cannot we accept Roles? It's short, well describing...
I am leaning towards Role. We can be more specific with adding some
extra word, e.g.:
* Node Role
* Deployment Role
... and if we are in the context of undercloud, people can shorten it to
just Roles. But 'Resource Category' seems to me that it doesn't solve
anything.
-- Jarda
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list