Open Stack

On 15/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
>> I think that in case of adding additional meeting rooms, we'll need to
>> avoid disparity between them in names. For example, currently we have a
>> lot of folks in #os-meeting and not so many in #os-meeting-alt, if we'll
>> have #os-meeting-alt-2 then we'll have even less folks there and it'll
>> be the same like making meeting in project channel.
>>
>> So, probably it'll be better to have meeting rooms named
>> #openstack-meeting-1(or -a?) and etc. and round robin meetings between
>> this channels.
>
>The trick is... renaming channels is hard, especially when 300 people
>lurk in one and have their setups pointing to them. I'm not sure the
>value of averaging lurking across meeting rooms outweighs the
>inconvenience renaming creates for existing users.
>
>There are already conflicts as people pick times that appear to be free
>but are actually used every other week... so a third room is definitely
>wanted. We can go and create #openstack-meeting3 (other suggestions
>welcome) and then discuss a consistent naming scheme and/or if renaming
>is such a good idea.


-meeting3 sounds good to me!

>
>-- 
>Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140115/36dec2d1/attachment.pgp>