Open Stack

On 01/09/2014 04:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 01/09/2014 04:12 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com
>> <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      That didn't seem to make a difference, still no cache.  The RPMS are
>>      not getting installed, even if I deliberately add a line for
>>      python-dogpile-cache
>>      Shouldn't it get installed via pip without the rpm line?
>>
>>
>> Yes pip should install it based on requirements.txt.  I just tried this
>> and see the install in /opt/stack/logs/stack.sh.log and then see the
>> import fail later.  God I love pip.  And there it is...xslt-config isn't
>> present so a whole batch of installs fails.
>>
>> Add this to files/rpms/keystone:
>>
>> libxslt-devel       # dist:f20
>>
>> There are some additional tweaks that I'll ask Flavio to add
>> to https://review.openstack.org/63647 as it needs at least one more
>> patch set anyway.
> So that would be the work around if the rpm doesn't work, but I really
> think we should use the rpm instead. I'm sort of confused that it didn't
> get picked up.
>
> Got more detailed output Adam?
>
> 	-Sean
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Let me see...

I erased the two rpms and reran unstack then

./stack.sh

seems to have worked.  I have a running Keystone.  Let me try again on a 
virgin machine....

Nope...with that patch applied, I have not python-lxml or 
python-dogpile-cache rpms.


Tried wiping out the (installed) python-greenlet rpm and re running, and 
that was not installed afterwards, either.  I am guessing that the 
package install step is getting skipped somehow, after the first run.







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140109/b63e3b10/attachment.html>