I'll ask on the operators list if there are any objections. If there are strong ones, we may need a new list created. Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thierry at openstack.org] > Sent: 09 January 2014 14:16 > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility > > Jay Pipes wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 14:26 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Tim Bell wrote: > >>> +1 from me too.... UpgradeImpact is a much better term. > >> > >> So this one is already documented[1], but I don't know if it actually > >> triggers anything yet. > >> > >> Should we configure it to post to openstack-operators, the same way > >> as SecurityImpact posts to openstack-security ? > > > > Huge +1 from me here. > > OK, this should do it: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65685 > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev