Open Stack

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:53 PM, David Kranz <dkranz at redhat.com> wrote:

>  On 12/27/2013 05:27 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
>
>       Hello guys!
>
>  I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a
> Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after vacations
> :)
>  After the summit we decided to track all tests that are being created for
> Ceilometer in Tempest here:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-ceilometer-tests.
> Besides, we've created an etherpad page with a test plan
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-test-plan.
>
>  But it turned out that it works very bad. Now we have at least 3 change
> requests that have common functionality implemented. So we definitely need
> more reliable mechanism for tracking any changes.
> That's why I suggest to create a separate blueprint for each
> functionality. E.g. "Ceilometer client for Tempest", "Notification testing"
> with several bps that depend on it ("Swift notifications", "Glance
> notifications", "Nova notifications") and so on. In future we may vary the
> detail level of blueprints but now we need very detailed ones because
> different people have started to work on e.g. notifications.
>  So there are the following action items:
>  1. Resolve all conflicts in changes that are on review now (see my
> comment to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39237/ patch set 21 for more
> details)
>  2. Create set of blueprints from the testplan we have
>  3. Add Tempest discussions to Ceilometer weekly meeting agenda (done)
>
>  I may take care of all the items above. I need only "ok" from PTLs and
> Cores.
>  Anyway, we've started working on 1st item, because it is urgent. The
> second one may be postponed due to holidays.
>
>  And one more important thing. Code review for Ceilometer tests in Tempest
> is too slow. Some of change requests are created almost a half a year ago!
> Ceilometer guys, please be informed. I think all of us are interested in
> good tests.
>
>  Thank you for attention,
>  Nadya
>
>
>  So the tempest patches for ceilometer are still not a coherent set. Can
> you please mark anything that is not ready for review as Work In Progress,
> or abandon until there is really something to review?
>
> Also, having looked at a few of these, I am confused about the usage of
> "ceilometer", "metering", "telemetry". Is there an explanation for the
> context in which each of these terms is to be used?
>

"Ceilometer" is the code name for the project, like "neutron" and "nova".

"OpenStack Telemetry" is the official name for ceilometer, like "OpenStack
Networking" and "OpenStack Compute".

Doug



>
>
>  -David
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140106/0968091a/attachment.html>