Open Stack

Ooh, I was wrong. Sorry. We use dash naming. We have “on-success”, “on-error” and so forth.

Please let us know if you see other inconsistencies.

Thanks

Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.



On 26 Feb 2014, at 21:00, Renat Akhmerov <rakhmerov at mirantis.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jay.
> 
> Regarding underscore naming. If you meant using underscore naming for “createVM” and “novaURL” then yes, “createVM” is just a task name and it’s a user preference. The same about “novaURL” which will be defined by users. As for keywords, seemingly we follow underscore naming.
> 
> Renat Akhmerov
> @ Mirantis Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> On 26 Feb 2014, at 17:58, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 14:38 +0700, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> I’m proposing to rename these two action types REST_API and
>>> MISTRAL_REST_API to HTTP and MISTRAL_HTTP. Words “REST” and “API”
>>> don’t look correct to me, if you look at
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Services:
>>> Nova:
>>>   type: REST_API
>>>   parameters:
>>>     baseUrl: {$.novaURL}
>>>   actions:
>>>     createVM:
>>>       parameters:
>>>         url: /servers/{$.vm_id}
>>>         method: POST
>>> 
>>> There’s no information about “REST” or “API” here. It’s just a spec
>>> how to form an HTTP request.
>> 
>> +1 on HTTP and MISTRAL_HTTP.
>> 
>> On an unrelated note, would it be possible to use under_score_naming
>> instead of camelCase naming?
>> 
>> Best,
>> -jay
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>