Open Stack

Thomas,

I feel your frustration, however before complaining please do follow
the actual chain of events.

Patch [1]: I asked a question which I never received an answer to.
Patch [2]: I did put a -1, but I have nothing against this patch per
se. This was only been recently abandoned and my -1 lied primarily to
give patch [1] the opportunity to be resumed.

No action on a negative review means automatic expiration, if you lose
interest in something you care about whose fault is that?

A.

[1] = https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52757
[2] = https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68611

On 19 February 2014 06:28, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen this one:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68611/
>
> which is suppose to fix something for Postgress. This is funny, because
> I was doing the exact same patch for fixing it for SQLite. Though this
> was before the last summit in HK.
>
> Since then, I just gave up on having my Debian specific patch [1] being
> upstreamed. No review, despite my insistence. Mark, on the HK summit,
> told me that it was pending discussion about what would be the policy
> for SQLite.
>
> Guys, this is disappointing. That's the 2nd time the same patch is being
> blocked, with no explanations.
>
> Could 2 core reviewers have a *serious* look at this patch, and explain
> why it's not ok for it to be approved? If nobody says why, then could
> this be approved, so we can move on?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
> [1]
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=openstack/neutron.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/fix-alembic-migration-with-sqlite3.patch;h=9108b45aaaf683e49b15338bacd813e50e9f563d;hb=b44e96d9e1d750e35513d63877eb05f167a175d8
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev