Open Stack

Hi Paul

Sorry, I have missed this mail.
The reason for putting -1 was the gating issue, so it is OK now.

PS
Thank you for your rebasing this one

2014-02-16 16:43 GMT-08:00 Sumit Naiksatam <sumitnaiksatam at gmail.com>:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF
> is concerned. That way any changes to STF can be explored in the
> context of all services, and the migration can also be performed for
> all services. Accordingly, Gary Duan has been actively working on the
> patch:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60699/
>
> and we hope to get it approved and merged soon.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sumit.
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Paul Michali <pcm at cisco.com> wrote:
>> Hi Nachi and other cores!
>>
>> I'm very close to publishing my vendor based VPNaaS driver (service driver
>> is ready, device driver is a day or two out), but have a bit of an issue.
>> This code uses the Service Type Framework, which, as you know, is still out
>> for review (and has been idle for a long time).  I updated the STF client
>> code and it is updated in Gerrit.
>>
>> I saw you put a -1 on your STF server code. Is the feature being abandoned
>> or was that for some other reason?
>>
>> If going forward with it, can you update the server STF code, or should I do
>> it (I have a branch with the STF based on master of about 2 weeks ago, so it
>> should update OK)?
>>
>> Also, I'm wondering (worried) about the logistics of my reviews. I wanted to
>> do my service driver and device driver separately (I guess making the latter
>> dependent on the former in Gerrit). However, because of the STF, I'd need to
>> make my service driver dependent on the STF server code too (my current
>> branch has both code pieces). Really worried about the complexity there and
>> about it getting hung up, if there is more delay on the STF review.
>>
>> I've been working on another branch without the STF dependency, however that
>> has to hack in part of the STF to be able to select the service driver based
>> on config vs hardwired to the reference driver.
>>
>> Should I proceed with the STF review chaining or push out my code w/o the
>> STF?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> PCM (Paul Michali)
>>
>> MAIL          pcm at cisco.com
>> IRC            pcm_  (irc.freenode.net)
>> TW            @pmichali
>> GPG key    4525ECC253E31A83
>> Fingerprint 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>