Open Stack

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:

>
> All this blind meatgrinder behavior was putting tons of code into the
> gate that could not pass. That, coupled with other race conditions we
> were dealing with, put us into a state where we had a 60hr gate queue.
>
> So we're trying out a new system. A change will not move into the gate
> unless there is both a +A and Jenkins +1 on the patch.
>
> We also rerun check results on comment if the test results are > 72hrs
> old, so there is always a reasonably fresh version of the results. This
> also helps detect merge conflicts early.
>
>
Thanks for the update Sean. I think the check re-run currently gets done
even if the new comment is a -2. Perhaps we could skip
it in that case?

Also when you +A a patch, if there aren't 24hr fresh test results, we
> rerun check first, then if that passes, it gets sent to the gate.
>
> There is still a bit of a sticky part of the flow if it fails in the
> gate. Because that means you don't satisfy the +1 jenkins requirement.
> Still trying to get the right flow worked out there.
>
>         -Sean
>
> On 02/18/2014 07:51 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> > You already can reverify on any approved change. Jenkins automatically
> > runs check pipeline jobs after 3 days.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Christopher Yeoh <cbkyeoh at gmail.com
> > <mailto:cbkyeoh at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com
> >     <mailto:gkotton at vmware.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         Thanks!
> >         That makes sense. Just odd how a -1 was received.
> >
> >
> >     So I think that now a "check" run is automatically done if the
> >     latest Jenkins run is too old (7 days?)
> >     This is done because gate failures are so costly. The check run
> >     failing would return -1 instead of a
> >     gate failure of -2.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         On 2/17/14 3:15 PM, "Akihiro Motoki" <motoki at da.jp.nec.com
> >         <mailto:motoki at da.jp.nec.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         >Hi Gary,
> >         >
> >         >According to zuul layout.yaml [1], "reverify bug #" should
> >         still work
> >         >but it seems to work only when verified score from jenkins is
> -2.
> >         >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://github.com/openstack-in
> >
> >fra/config/blob/master/modules/openstack_project/files/zuul/layout.yaml%23
> >
> >L25&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg4
> >
> >5MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59xIcg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&
> >
> >s=8fc4d7e6970936977dc85989e4e7e9429afb15f5091a768efa4ce236417d9c9b
> >         >
> >         >Note that core team can trigger gate jobs by re-approving the
> >         patch.
> >         >
> >         >Thanks,
> >         >Akihiro
> >         >
> >         >(2014/02/17 22:03), Gary Kotton wrote:
> >         >> Hi,
> >         >> The "reverify no bug" was removed. But "reverify bug #" used
> >         to work.
> >         >>That no longer does. With the constant gate failures how can
> >         we ensure
> >         >>that a approved patch does a retry?
> >         >> Thanks
> >         >> Gary
> >         >>
> >         >> From: Sylvain Bauza <sylvain.bauza at gmail.com
> >         <mailto:sylvain.bauza at gmail.com>
> >         >><mailto:sylvain.bauza at gmail.com <mailto:
> sylvain.bauza at gmail.com>>>
> >         >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> >         >>questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >         >><mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>>
> >         >> Date: Monday, February 17, 2014 2:53 PM
> >         >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> >         questions)"
> >         >><openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >         >><mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>>
> >         >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck
> >         >>
> >         >> Hi Gary,
> >         >>
> >         >> That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, see
> >         >>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/pip
> >
> >>ermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw
> >
> >>%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2Fy
> >
> >>HMSSchQO59xIcg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=826274ca8ad9562b557322274a
> >         >>cdacd97482338456820af8c330b76ea7639838
> >         >>
> >         >><
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/pi
> >
> >>permail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLq
> >
> >>w%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=B8yQ75
> >
> >>uRFa7dyD%2FbgPgO%2FMT2x229MkK1vHWBVAzpFtM%3D%0A&s=d9cbcbde99b7c88c15ca138
> >         >>499de8f36edd4247ce351e41b241d675b09b79956>
> >         >>
> >         >> -Sylvain
> >         >>
> >         >>
> >         >> 2014-02-17 13:00 GMT+01:00 Gary Kotton <gkotton at vmware.com
> >         <mailto:gkotton at vmware.com>
> >         >><mailto:gkotton at vmware.com <mailto:gkotton at vmware.com>>>:
> >         >>
> >         >>     Hi,
> >         >>     It seems that the command 'reverify bug <number>' is not
> >         working.
> >         >>Anyone else experienced this lately.
> >         >>     Thanks
> >         >>     Gary
> >         >>
> >         >>     _______________________________________________
> >         >>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >         >>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >         >><mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> >         >>
> >         >>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
> >
> >>-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r
> >
> >>=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59x
> >
> >>Icg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=1a2a59024e18b786b5c2c13535b7f3d050363
> >         >>ff628dc96b8561e12489d30c0bd
> >         >>
> >         >><
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cg
> >
> >>i-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&
> >
> >>r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=B8yQ75uRFa7dyD%2F
> >
> >>bgPgO%2FMT2x229MkK1vHWBVAzpFtM%3D%0A&s=21e7f4ebc24f0a13780981720f9332111d
> >         >>d603f3c0661229dc90d82bfb5c3122>
> >         >>
> >         >>
> >         >>
> >         >>
> >         >> _______________________________________________
> >         >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >         >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >         >>
> >         >>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
> >
> >>-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r
> >
> >>=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59x
> >
> >>Icg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=1a2a59024e18b786b5c2c13535b7f3d050363
> >         >>ff628dc96b8561e12489d30c0bd
> >         >>
> >         >_______________________________________________
> >         >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >         >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >         >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-
> >
> >bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=e
> >
> >H0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59xIcg
> >
> >6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=1a2a59024e18b786b5c2c13535b7f3d050363ff62
> >         >8dc96b8561e12489d30c0bd
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >         OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours,
> > Sergey Lukjanov
> > Savanna Technical Lead
> > Mirantis Inc.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> Samsung Research America
> sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
> http://dague.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140219/16f1c2b9/attachment.html>