Open Stack

Joe,

I will let others comment, but since I think this BP was proposed much before the multi-tenant hierarchy BP, I would like to at least have the discussion. I would suggest a pause until we agree that this is ok to move this forward independently of the multi tenant hierarchy proposal.

JC

On Feb 14, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Joe Gordon <joe.gordon0 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Martin, JC <jch.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> There is a Blueprint targeted for Icehouse-3 that is aiming to implement the AWS VPC api. I don't think that this blueprint is providing the necessary constructs to really implement a VPC, and it is not taking into account the domains, or proposed multi tenant hierarchy. In addition, I could not find a discussion about this topic leading to the approval.
> 
> Nova doesn't support keystone V3 domains or the proposed multi tenant
> hierarchy (proposed after this BP) yet. Do you think this BP should be
> blocked with those two as dependencies?
> 
>> 
>> For this reason, I wrote an 'umbrella' blueprint to hopefully start the discussion on how to really implement VPC, and eventually split it into multiple real blueprints for each area.
>> 
>> Please, provide feedback on the following document, and on the best way to move this forward.
>> 
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-VPC
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> JC.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev