[openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating "required use" upstream code
Thierry Carrez
thierry at openstack.org
Thu Feb 6 13:41:25 UTC 2014
Mark Washenberger wrote:
> I don't have any issue defining what I think of as typical extension /
> variation seams in the Glance code base. However, I'm still struggling
> to understand what all this means for our projects and our ecosystem.
> Basically, why do I care? What are the implications of a 0% vs 100%
> designation? Are we hoping to improve interoperability, or encourage
> more upstream collaboration, or what?
>
> How many deployments do we expect to get the trademark after this core
> definition process is completed?
Yes... what is the end goal ? I agree that's important (and influences a
bit our response here). But that's a separate discussion, one I've
started on the foundation ML:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2014-February/001620.html
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list