Open Stack

On 12/24/2014 04:07 AM, Oleg Bondarev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/22/2014 01:32 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Rather than waste your time making excuses let me state where we are
>> and
>>>>> where I would like to get to, also sharing my thoughts about how you
>> can
>>>>> get involved if you want to see this happen as badly as I have been
>> told
>>>>> you do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where we are:
>>>>>     * a great deal of foundation work has been accomplished to achieve
>>>>> parity with nova-network and neutron to the extent that those involved
>>>>> are ready for migration plans to be formulated and be put in place
>>>>>     * a summit session happened with notes and intentions[0]
>>>>>     * people took responsibility and promptly got swamped with other
>>>>> responsibilities
>>>>>     * spec deadlines arose and in neutron's case have passed
>>>>>     * currently a neutron spec [1] is a work in progress (and it needs
>>>>> significant work still) and a nova spec is required and doesn't have a
>>>>> first draft or a champion
>>>>>
>>>>> Where I would like to get to:
>>>>>     * I need people in addition to Oleg Bondarev to be available to
>> help
>>>>> come up with ideas and words to describe them to create the specs in a
>>>>> very short amount of time (Oleg is doing great work and is a fabulous
>>>>> person, yay Oleg, he just can't do this alone)
>>>>>     * specifically I need a contact on the nova side of this complex
>>>>> problem, similar to Oleg on the neutron side
>>>>>     * we need to have a way for people involved with this effort to
>> find
>>>>> each other, talk to each other and track progress
>>>>>     * we need to have representation at both nova and neutron weekly
>>>>> meetings to communicate status and needs
>>>>>
>>>>> We are at K-2 and our current status is insufficient to expect this
>> work
>>>>> will be accomplished by the end of K-3. I will be championing this
>> work,
>>>>> in whatever state, so at least it doesn't fall off the map. If you
>> would
>>>>> like to help this effort please get in contact. I will be thinking of
>>>>> ways to further this work and will be communicating to those who
>>>>> identify as affected by these decisions in the most effective methods
>> of
>>>>> which I am capable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you to all who have gotten us as far as well have gotten in this
>>>>> effort, it has been a long haul and you have all done great work. Let's
>>>>> keep going and finish this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Anita.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for volunteering to drive this effort Anita, I am very happy
>>>> about this. I support you 100%.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to point out that we really need a point of contact on the nova
>>>> side, similar to Oleg on the Neutron side. IMHO, this is step 1 here to
>>>> continue moving this forward.
>>>>
>>>
>>> At the summit the nova team marked the nova-network to neutron migration
>> as
>>> a priority [0], so we are collectively interested in seeing this happen
>> and
>>> want to help in any way possible.   With regard to a nova point of
>> contact,
>>> anyone in nova-specs-core should work, that way we can cover more time
>>> zones.
>>>
>>> From what I can gather the first step is to finish fleshing out the first
>>> spec [1], and it sounds like it would be good to get a few nova-cores
>>> reviewing it as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [0]
>>>
>> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/priorities/kilo-priorities.html
>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142456/
>>>
>>>
>> Wonderful, thank you for the support Joe.
>>
>> It appears that we need to have a regular weekly meeting to track
>> progress in an archived manner.
>>
>> I know there was one meeting November but I don't know what it was
>> called so so far I can't find the logs for that.
>>
> 
> It wasn't official, we just gathered together on #novamigration. Attaching
> the log here.
> 
Ah, that would explain why I couldn't find the log. Thanks for the
attachment.
> 
>> So if those affected by this issue can identify what time (UTC please,
>> don't tell me what time zone you are in it is too hard to guess what UTC
>> time you are available) and day of the week you are available for a
>> meeting I'll create one and we can start talking to each other.
>>
>> I need to avoid Monday 1500 and 2100 UTC, Tuesday 0800 UTC, 1400 UTC and
>> 1900 - 2200 UTC, Wednesdays 1500 - 1700 UTC, Thursdays 1400 and 2100 UTC.
>>
> 
> I'm available each weekday 0700-1600 UTC, 1700-1800 UTC is also acceptable.
> 
> Thanks,
> Oleg
Wonderful, thank you Oleg. We will aim for a meeting time in this range.
I also understand holidays in Russia start on January 1 and go until the
11th or the 12th, I'm guessing this includes you.

Thanks,
Anita.
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anita.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kyle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-nova-network-to-neutron
>>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142456/
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>>>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>