Open Stack

Folks, 

I appended some more ideas on making for-each loop more readable / less confusing in the document. 

It’s not rocking the boat (yet) - all the key agreements done that far, stay so far. It’s refinements. 

Please take a look, leave comments, +1 / -1 for various ideas, and leave your ideas there, too. 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iw0OgQcU0LV_i3Lnbax9NqAJ397zSYA3PMvl6F_uqm0/edit#heading=h.5hjdjqxsgfle

DZ. 

On Dec 19, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Dmitri Zimine <dzimine at stackstorm.com> wrote:

> Thanks Angus. 
> 
> One obvious thing is we either make it somewhat consistent, or name it differently. 
> These looks similar, at least on the surface. I wonder if the feedback we’ve got so far (for-each is confusing because it brings wrong expectations) is applicable to Heat, too. 
> 
> Another observation on naming consistency - mistral uses dash, like `for-each`. 
> Heat uses _underscores when naming YAML keys. 
> So does TOSCA standard. We should have thought about this earlier but it may be not late to fix it while v2 spec is still forming. 
> 
> DZ. 
> 
> 
> On Dec 18, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Angus Salkeld <asalkeld at mirantis.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Nikolay Makhotkin <nmakhotkin at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Here is the doc with suggestions on specification for for-each feature.
>> 
>> You are free to comment and ask questions.
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iw0OgQcU0LV_i3Lnbax9NqAJ397zSYA3PMvl6F_uqm0/edit?usp=sharing
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Just as a drive by comment, there is a Heat spec for a "for-each": https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140849/
>> (there hasn't been a lot of feedback for it yet tho')
>> 
>> Nice to have these somewhat consistent.
>> 
>> -Angus
>>  
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best Regards,Nikolay
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141219/69c1e354/attachment.html>