Open Stack

On 12/15/2014 07:11 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 12/11/2014 12:03 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 12/11/2014 09:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
>>> Heya, quick Ceph CI status update.  Once the test_volume_boot_pattern
>>> was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing.  I have
>>> submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and that yields an all green
>>> ceph ci run [2].  So at the moment, and with my revert patch, we're in
>>> good shape.
>>>
>>> I will fix up that patch today so that it can be properly reviewed and
>>> hopefully merged.  From there I'll submit a patch to infra to move the
>>> job to the check queue as non-voting, and we can go from there.
>>>
>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139693/
>>> [2] http://logs.openstack.org/93/139693/1/experimental/check-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/12397fd/console.html
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>> Please add the name of your CI account to this table:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems
>>
>> As outlined in the third party CI requirements:
>> http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements
>>
>> Please post system status updates to your individual CI wikipage that is
>> linked to this table.
>>
>> The mailing list is not the place to post status updates for third party
>> CI systems.
>>
>> If you have questions about any of the above, please attend one of the
>> two third party meetings and ask any and all questions until you are
>> satisfied. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Third_Party_Meeting
> 
> This is not a third party CI system.  This is a job running in OpenStack
> infra.  It was in the experimental pipeline while bugs were being fixed.
>  This report is about those bugs being fixed and Jon giving a heads up
> that he thinks it will be ready to move to the check queue very soon.
> 
My mistake then, thank you for the explanation. Going forward can we
avoid the use of CI in the subject line for emails about jobs running in
infra and their status?

Thank you,
Anita.