[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [RFC] Floating IP idea solicitation and collaboration

Carl Baldwin carl at ecbaldwin.net
Mon Dec 8 19:57:03 UTC 2014


Ryan,

I'll be traveling around the time of the L3 meeting this week.  My
flight leaves 40 minutes after the meeting and I might have trouble
attending.  It might be best to put it off a week or to plan another
time -- maybe Friday -- when we could discuss it in IRC or in a
Hangout.

Carl

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Ryan Clevenger
<ryan.clevenger at rackspace.com> wrote:
> Thanks for getting back Carl. I think we may be able to make this weeks
> meeting. Jason Kölker is the engineer doing all of the lifting on this side.
> Let me get with him to review what you all have so far and check our
> availability.
>
> ________________________________________
>
> Ryan Clevenger
> Manager, Cloud Engineering - US
> m: 678.548.7261
> e: ryan.clevenger at rackspace.com
>
> ________________________________
> From: Carl Baldwin [carl at ecbaldwin.net]
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 4:04 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [RFC] Floating IP idea solicitation
> and collaboration
>
> Ryan,
>
> I have been working with the L3 sub team in this direction.  Progress has
> been slow because of other priorities but we have made some.  I have written
> a blueprint detailing some changes needed to the code to enable the
> flexibility to one day run glaring ups on an l3 routed network [1].  Jaime
> has been working on one that integrates ryu (or other speakers) with neutron
> [2].  Dvr was also a step in this direction.
>
> I'd like to invite you to the l3 weekly meeting [3] to discuss further.  I'm
> very happy to see interest in this area and have someone new to collaborate.
>
> Carl
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88619/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125401/
> [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-L3-Subteam
>
> On Dec 3, 2014 4:04 PM, "Ryan Clevenger" <ryan.clevenger at rackspace.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> At Rackspace, we have a need to create a higher level networking service
>> primarily for the purpose of creating a Floating IP solution in our
>> environment. The current solutions for Floating IPs, being tied to plugin
>> implementations, does not meet our needs at scale for the following reasons:
>>
>> 1. Limited endpoint H/A mainly targeting failover only and not
>> multi-active endpoints,
>> 2. Lack of noisy neighbor and DDOS mitigation,
>> 3. IP fragmentation (with cells, public connectivity is terminated inside
>> each cell leading to fragmentation and IP stranding when cell CPU/Memory use
>> doesn't line up with allocated IP blocks. Abstracting public connectivity
>> away from nova installations allows for much more efficient use of those
>> precious IPv4 blocks).
>> 4. Diversity in transit (multiple encapsulation and transit types on a per
>> floating ip basis).
>>
>> We realize that network infrastructures are often unique and such a
>> solution would likely diverge from provider to provider. However, we would
>> love to collaborate with the community to see if such a project could be
>> built that would meet the needs of providers at scale. We believe that, at
>> its core, this solution would boil down to terminating north<->south traffic
>> temporarily at a massively horizontally scalable centralized core and then
>> encapsulating traffic east<->west to a specific host based on the
>> association setup via the current L3 router's extension's 'floatingips'
>> resource.
>>
>> Our current idea, involves using Open vSwitch for header rewriting and
>> tunnel encapsulation combined with a set of Ryu applications for management:
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/bivSdcC.png
>>
>> The Ryu application uses Ryu's BGP support to announce up to the Public
>> Routing layer individual floating ips (/32's or /128's) which are then
>> summarized and announced to the rest of the datacenter. If a particular
>> floating ip is experiencing unusually large traffic (DDOS, slashdot effect,
>> etc.), the Ryu application could change the announcements up to the Public
>> layer to shift that traffic to dedicated hosts setup for that purpose. It
>> also announces a single /32 "Tunnel Endpoint" ip downstream to the TunnelNet
>> Routing system which provides transit to and from the cells and their
>> hypervisors. Since traffic from either direction can then end up on any of
>> the FLIP hosts, a simple flow table to modify the MAC and IP in either the
>> SRC or DST fields (depending on traffic direction) allows the system to be
>> completely stateless. We have proven this out (with static routing and
>> flows) to work reliably in a small lab setup.
>>
>> On the hypervisor side, we currently plumb networks into separate OVS
>> bridges. Another Ryu application would control the bridge that handles
>> overlay networking to selectively divert traffic destined for the default
>> gateway up to the FLIP NAT systems, taking into account any configured
>> logical routing and local L2 traffic to pass out into the existing overlay
>> fabric undisturbed.
>>
>> Adding in support for L2VPN EVPN
>> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-11) and L2VPN EVPN
>> Overlay (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03) to the
>> Ryu BGP speaker will allow the hypervisor side Ryu application to advertise
>> up to the FLIP system reachability information to take into account VM
>> failover, live-migrate, and supported encapsulation types. We believe that
>> decoupling the tunnel endpoint discovery from the control plane
>> (Nova/Neutron) will provide for a more robust solution as well as allow for
>> use outside of openstack if desired.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> Ryan Clevenger
>> Manager, Cloud Engineering - US
>> m: 678.548.7261
>> e: ryan.clevenger at rackspace.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list