[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Do we want to remove Nova-bm support?

Chris Jones cmsj at tenshu.net
Thu Dec 4 16:16:53 UTC 2014


AFAIK there are no products out there using tripleo&nova-bm, but maybe a quick post to -operators asking if this will ruin anyone's day, would be good?

Chris Jones

> On 4 Dec 2014, at 04:47, Steve Kowalik <steven at wedontsleep.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>    I'm becoming increasingly concerned about all of the code paths
> in tripleo-incubator that check $USE_IRONIC -eq 0 -- that is, use
> nova-baremetal rather than Ironic. We do not check nova-bm support in
> CI, haven't for at least a month, and I'm concerned that parts of it
> may be slowly bit-rotting.
>    I think our documentation is fairly clear that nova-baremetal is
> deprecated and Ironic is the way forward, and I know it flies in the
> face of backwards-compatibility, but do we want to bite the bullet and
> remove nova-bm support?
> Cheers,
> -- 
>                                        Steve
> Oh, in case you got covered in that Repulsion Gel, here's some advice
> the lab boys gave me: [paper rustling] DO NOT get covered in the
> Repulsion Gel.
>         - Cave Johnson, CEO of Aperture Science
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list