Being able to make some impact on Pecan is an advantage for sure. But there are other aspects in choosing a web framework and I’d rather discuss them. Let’s not think about what is used in other OpenStack projects for a moment and discuss technical details. > On 03 Dec 2014, at 15:53, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sebastian Kalinowski wrote: >> I think that as a part of OpenStack community we should stick with >> Pecan and because of the same reason we can have a bigger impact how >> future versions of Pecan will look. > > Yes, this. ++ > > -jay > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141203/d1edfa9d/attachment.pgp>