[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Nailgun] Web framework

Roman Prykhodchenko rprikhodchenko at mirantis.com
Wed Dec 3 15:16:59 UTC 2014

Being able to make some impact on Pecan is an advantage for sure. But there are other aspects in choosing a web framework and I’d rather discuss them.
Let’s not think about what is used in other OpenStack projects for a moment and discuss technical details.

> On 03 Dec 2014, at 15:53, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sebastian Kalinowski wrote:
>> I think that as a part of OpenStack community we should stick with
>> Pecan and because of the same reason we can have a bigger impact how
>> future versions of Pecan will look.
> Yes, this. ++
> -jay
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141203/d1edfa9d/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list