Open Stack

I think we need some clarification here too about the difference between
the general OpenStack Incubation and the Neutron incubation. From my
understanding, the Neutron incubation isn't the path to a separate project
and independence from Neutron. It's a process to get into Neutron. So if
you want to keep it as a separate project with its own cores and a PTL,
Neutron incubation would not be the way to go.


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Susanne Balle <sleipnir012 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the info
> on incubation:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects
>
> Susanne
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Susanne Balle <sleipnir012 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  I would like to discuss the pros and cons of putting Octavia into the
>> Neutron LBaaS incubator project right away. If it is going to be the
>> reference implementation for LBaaS v 2 then I believe Octavia belong in
>> Neutron LBaaS v2 incubator.
>>
>> The Pros:
>> * Octavia is in Openstack incubation right away along with the lbaas v2
>> code. We do not have to apply for incubation later on.
>> * As incubation project we have our own core and should be able ot commit
>> our code
>> * We are starting out as an OpenStack incubated project
>>
>> The Cons:
>> * Not sure of the velocity of the project
>> * Incubation not well defined.
>>
>> If Octavia starts as a standalone stackforge project we are assuming that
>> it would be looked favorable on when time is to move it into incubated
>> status.
>>
>> Susanne
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Kevin Benton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140828/7dcc2562/attachment.html>