Open Stack

On 08/28/2014 01:44 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:

>> I understand that reviews are a burden and very hard but it seems wrong
>> that a BP with multiple positive reviews and no negative reviews is
>> dropped because of what looks like indifference.
>
> I would posit that this is not actually indifference. The reason that
> there may not have been >1 +2 from a core team member may very well have
> been that the core team members did not feel that the blueprint's
> priority was high enough to put before other work, or that the core team
> members did have the time to comment on the spec (due to them not
> feeling the blueprint had the priority to justify the time to do a full
> review).

The overall "scheduler-lib" Blueprint is marked with a "high" priority 
at "http://status.openstack.org/release/".  Hopefully that would apply 
to sub-blueprints as well.

Chris