Open Stack

On 08/28/2014 12:50 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:51:32AM +0000, Alan Kavanagh wrote:
>>> How to do we handle specs that have slipped through the cracks
>>> and did not make it for Juno?
>>
>> Rebase the proposal so it is under the 'kilo' directory path
>> instead of 'juno' and submit it for review again. Make sure
>> to keep the ChangeId line intact so people see the history
>> of any review comments in the earlier Juno proposal.
>
> Yes, but...
>
> I think we should talk about tweaking the structure of the juno
> directory. Something like having proposed, approved, and implemented
> directories. That would provide better signalling to operators about
> what we actually did, what we thought we'd do, and what we didn't do.

I think this would be really useful.

-jay