How to do we handle specs that have slipped through the cracks and did not make it for Juno? /Alan From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:sorlando at nicira.com] Sent: August-28-14 9:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Specs for K release I think it's ok to submit specs for Kilo - mostly because it would be a bit pointless submitting them for Juno! Salvatore On 28 August 2014 09:26, Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com<mailto:blak111 at gmail.com>> wrote: You could just make the kilo folder in your commit and then rebase it once Kilo is open. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Andreas Scheuring <scheuran at linux.vnet.ibm.com<mailto:scheuran at linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: Hi, is it already possible to submit specs (nova & neutron) for the K release? Would be great for getting early feedback and tracking comments. Or should I just commit it to the juno folder? Thanks, Andreas _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Kevin Benton _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140828/9989dc24/attachment.html>