[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run
Hemanth Ravi
hemanthraviml at gmail.com
Thu Aug 21 20:37:09 UTC 2014
Edgar,
CI name: One Convergence CI
The logs issue has been fixed and earlier tests were failing due to
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114146
For reference:
1. Please take a look at the vote on patchset 7 in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114968/
2. Logs at
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/czydzz5bn2rc2lp/AABZByV8UQUIqWaZSSrZvzvDa
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Our system would get backed up with patches and sometimes take up to 10
> hours to respond with results for a change.
> We should establish some maximum acceptable time to get the results for a
> patch.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Maximum time to vote, can you clarify?
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> From: Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 at 1:11 PM
>>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>> required to be run
>>
>> I also added a two more nodes to our cluster to reduce the delay. Can
>> we establish a maximum time to vote on the wiki?
>> On Aug 19, 2014 9:39 AM, "Edgar Magana" <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Kevin,
>>>
>>> I just verified, Thanks a lot.
>>>
>>> Edgar
>>>
>>> From: Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>>> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>> Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM
>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>>> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>>> required to be run
>>>
>>> You didn't wait long enough for the Big Switch CI to reach your
>>> negative test. :-)
>>> Currently the CI system is backed by about 100 patches to push
>>> responses out ~22 hours.
>>>
>>> This does bring up an old discussion that was never resolved.
>>> What is the minimum expected response time for CI systems?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Team,
>>>>
>>>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few
>>>> plugins
>>>> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>>>> I created a report here:
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
>>>> _and_Drivers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
>>>> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>>>> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>>>>
>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>>>>
>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
>>>> failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>>>>
>>>> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore
>>>> this
>>>> report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from Neutron
>>>> tree.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Edgar
>>>>
>>>> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
>>>> job!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>>>> >Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
>>>> >more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
>>>> >third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
>>>> >third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below
>>>> >and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have
>>>> >questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask
>>>> >questions.
>>>> >
>>>> >Thanks,
>>>> >Kyle
>>>> >
>>>> >[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>>>> >[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>>>> >
>>>> >_______________________________________________
>>>> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kevin Benton
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kevin Benton
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140821/361cb794/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list