Open Stack

Dane,

Wiki has been updated.

Thanks,

Edgar

On 8/21/14, 7:57 AM, "Dane Leblanc (leblancd)" <leblancd at cisco.com> wrote:

>Edgar:
>
>The status on the wiki page says "Results are not accurate. Needs
>clarification from Cisco".
>Can you please tell me what we are missing?
>
>-Dane
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
>Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 3:05 PM
>To: 'Edgar Magana'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>questions)
>Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>
>The APIC CI did run tests against that commit (after some queue latency):
>
>http://128.107.233.28:8080/job/apic/1860/
>http://cisco-neutron-ci.cisco.com/logs/apic/1860/
>
>But the review comments never showed up on Gerrit. This seems to be an
>intermittent quirk of Jenkins/Gerrit: We have 3 CIs triggered from this
>Jenkins/Gerrit server. Whenever we disable another one of our other
>Jenkins jobs (in this case, we disabled DFA for some rework), the review
>comments sometimes stop showing up on Gerrit.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 1:33 PM
>To: Dane Leblanc (leblancd); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>
>I was looking to one of the most recent Neutron commits:
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115175/
>
>
>I could not find the APIC report.
>
>Edgar
>
>On 8/19/14, 9:48 AM, "Dane Leblanc (leblancd)" <leblancd at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>From which commit is it missing?
>>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114629/
>>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:28 PM
>>To: Dane Leblanc (leblancd); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
>>for usage questions)
>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>>required to be run
>>
>>Dane,
>>
>>Are you sure about it?
>>I just went to this commit and I could not find the APIC tests.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Edgar
>>
>>On 8/17/14, 8:47 PM, "Dane Leblanc (leblancd)" <leblancd at cisco.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Edgar:
>>>
>>>The Cisco APIC should be reporting results for both APIC-related and
>>>non-APIC related changes now.
>>>(See http://cisco-neutron-ci.cisco.com/logs/apic/1738/).
>>>
>>>Will you be updating the wiki page?
>>>
>>>-Dane
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
>>>Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:18 PM
>>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>>>required to be run
>>>
>>>Also, you can add me as a contact person for the Cisco VPNaaS driver.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
>>>Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:14 PM
>>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>>>required to be run
>>>
>>>Edgar:
>>>
>>>For the Notes for the Cisco APIC, can you change the comment "results
>>>are fake" to something like "results are only valid for APIC-related
>>>commits"? I think this more accurately represents our current results
>>>(for reasons we chatted about on another thread).
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Dane
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com]
>>>Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM
>>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>>>required to be run
>>>Importance: High
>>>
>>>Team,
>>>
>>>I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few
>>>plugins and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron
>>>commits.
>>>I created a report here:
>>>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_P
>>>l
>>>ugi
>>>n
>>>_and_Drivers
>>>
>>>
>>>We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting.
>>>So please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>>>I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>>>
>>>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>>>
>>>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>>>
>>>
>>>I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
>>>failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>>>
>>>Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore
>>>this report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from
>>>Neutron tree.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Edgar
>>>
>>>P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
>>>job!
>>>
>>>
>>>On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>>>>Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
>>>>more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
>>>>third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
>>>>third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below
>>>>and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have
>>>>questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask
>>>>questions.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Kyle
>>>>
>>>>[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>>>>[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>