Open Stack

On 20/08/14 15:37, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> For example, everyone agrees that Ceilometer has
>> room for improvement, but any implication that the Ceilometer is not
>> interested in or driving towards those improvements (because of NIH or
>> whatever) is, as has been pointed out, grossly unfair to the Ceilometer
>> team.
>
> I certainly have not made such an implication about Ceilometer.

Sorry, yes, I didn't intend to imply any such... implication on your 
part. I was actually trying (evidently unsuccessfully) to avoid getting 
into finger-pointing at all, and simply make a general statement that if 
anyone were, hypothetically, to imply that the team are not committed to 
improvements, then that would be unfair. Hypothetically.

Is it Friday yet?

- ZB