On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:17:40PM +0000, Tim Bell wrote: > Michael has been posting very informative blogs on the summary of > the mid-cycle meetups for Nova. The one on the Nova Network to > Neutron migration was of particular interest to me as it raises a > number of potential impacts for the CERN production cloud. The blog > itself is at http://www.stillhq.com/openstack/juno/000014.html FWIW, I do *not* support the following policy statement written there "The current plan is to go forward with a cold upgrade path, unless a user comes forward with an absolute hard requirement for a live upgrade, and a plan to fund developers to work on it." I think that saying that our users are responsible for providing or identifying funding for live upgrades is user-hostile & unacceptable. If we as a dev team want to take away major features that our users currently rely on in production and the users then determine (& tell us) that the proposed upgrade path is not practical, then it is the *dev team's* reponsibility to figure out how address that, not the users. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|