Open Stack

I also added a two more nodes to our cluster to reduce the delay. Can we
establish a maximum time to vote on the wiki?
On Aug 19, 2014 9:39 AM, "Edgar Magana" <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:

>  Kevin,
>
>  I just verified, Thanks a lot.
>
>  Edgar
>
>   From: Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
> required to be run
>
>   You didn't wait long enough for the Big Switch CI to reach your
> negative test. :-)
>  Currently the CI system is backed by about 100 patches to push responses
> out ~22 hours.
>
>  This does bring up an old discussion that was never resolved.
> What is the minimum expected response time for CI systems?
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Team,
>>
>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
>> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>> I created a report here:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
>> _and_Drivers
>>
>>
>> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
>> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>>
>>
>> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
>> failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>>
>> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore this
>> report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from Neutron
>> tree.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
>> job!
>>
>>
>> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>> >Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
>> >more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
>> >third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
>> >third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below
>> >and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have
>> >questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask
>> >questions.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Kyle
>> >
>> >[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>> >[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> Kevin Benton
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140819/1768fefe/attachment.html>