Open Stack

I just added it to the wiki page.

Thanks,

Edgar

On 8/17/14, 8:49 PM, "Balaji.P at freescale.com" <Balaji.P at freescale.com>
wrote:

>Hi Edgar,
>
>Freescale CI is not listed in the below report:
>
>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Pl
>
>We are following all the requirements of CI setup and as well
>participating in the IRC Meeting. Can you please let us know if we are
>missing any other requirements of CI Setup.
>
>Regards,
>Balaji.P
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com
>> [mailto:trinath.somanchi at freescale.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:04 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>> required to be run
>> 
>> Hi Edgar,
>> 
>> Freescale CI is reporting the results for ML2 Mechanism driver (J-1) and
>> FWaaS Plugin (to be approved for J-3).
>> I'm the owner for this CI.
>> 
>> The Wiki page for this CI is
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Freescale_CI.
>> 
>> --
>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208
>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:06 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>> required to be run
>> Importance: High
>> 
>> Team,
>> 
>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few
>>plugins
>> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>> I created a report here:
>> 
>>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plug
>> in
>> _and_Drivers
>> 
>> 
>> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
>> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>> 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>> 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>> 
>> 
>> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
>> failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>> 
>> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore
>> this report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from
>> Neutron tree.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Edgar
>> 
>> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
>> job!
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>> >Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
>> >more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
>> >third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
>> >third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below and
>> >make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have questions, the
>> >weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask questions.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Kyle
>> >
>> >[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>> >[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev