[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals
james.slagle at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 12:42:43 UTC 2014
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Robert Collins
<robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
> seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
> I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak:
> 19:46:34 <lifeless> so I propose that +2 on a spec is a commitment to
> review it over-and-above the core review responsibilities
> 19:47:05 <lifeless> if its not important enough for a reviewer to do
> that thats a pretty strong signal
> 19:47:06 <dprince> lifeless: +1, I thought we already agreed to that
> at the meetup
> 19:47:17 <slagle> yea, sounds fine to me
> 19:47:20 <bnemec> +1
> 19:47:30 <lifeless> dprince: it wasn't clear whether it was
> part-of-responsibility, or additive, I'm proposing we make it clearly
> 19:47:52 <lifeless> and separately I think we need to make surfacing
> reviews-for-themes a lot better
> That is - +1 on a spec review is 'sure, I like it', +2 is specifically
> "I will review this *over and above* my core commitment" - the goal
> here is to have some very gentle choke on concurrent WIP without
> needing the transition to a managed pull workflow that Nova are
> discussing - which we didn't have much support for during the meeting.
> Obviously, any core can -2 for any of the usual reasons - this motion
> is about opening up +A to the whole Tripleo core team on specs.
> Reviewers, and other interested kibbitzers, please +1 / -1 as you feel fit :)
+1 from me. I've also added the +1/+2 distinction under the Reviewer
workload bullet item on the wiki page.
-- James Slagle
More information about the OpenStack-dev