Open Stack

On 2014/08/18 0:12, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
>> Team,
>>
>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
>> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>> I created a report here:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
>> _and_Drivers
>>
> Can you link this and/or move it to this page:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronPlugins
>
> This is under the "NeutronPolicies" wiki page which I did at the start
> of Juno. This tracks all policies and procedures for Neutron, and
> there's a Plugins page (which I linked to above) where this should
> land.

I just added the link Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
to NeutronPlugins wiki.

The wiki pages NeutronPlugins and Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers
cover the similar contents. According to the history of the page,
the latter one was created by Mark at Nov 2013 (beginning of Icehouse cycle).
It seems better to merge these two pages to avoid the confusion.

Akihiro

>
>>
>> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
>> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>>
>>
>> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
>> failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>>
>> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore this
>> report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from Neutron tree.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty job!
>>
> Thanks for sending this out Edgar and doing this analysis! Can you
> please put an agenda item on Monday's meeting to discuss this? I won't
> be at the meeting as I'm on PTO (Mark is running the meeting in my
> absence), but I'd like the team to discuss this and allow all
> third-party people a chance to be there and share their feelings here.
>
> Thanks,
> Kyle
>
>>
>> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>>> Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
>>> more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
>>> third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
>>> third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below
>>> and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have
>>> questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask
>>> questions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kyle
>>>
>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>